From owner-cvs-usrbin  Thu Jul  2 07:19:55 1998
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-usrbin>
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA29788
          for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Thu, 2 Jul 1998 07:19:55 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-cvs-usrbin)
Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id HAA29713;
          Thu, 2 Jul 1998 07:19:35 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net)
Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [195.204.143.218])
	by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id OAA27813;
	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 14:19:35 GMT
Received: (from eivind@localhost)
	by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.8/8.8.6) id QAA17166;
	Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:19:34 +0200 (MET DST)
Message-ID: <19980702161934.17898@follo.net>
Date: Thu, 2 Jul 1998 16:19:34 +0200
From: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= <sos@FreeBSD.ORG>,
        cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG,
        cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/doscmd intff.c
References: <199807021407.HAA05486@freefall.freebsd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.89.1i
In-Reply-To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3C199807021407=2EHAA05486=40freefall=2Efreebsd=2Eorg=3E?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3B_from_S=F8ren_Schmidt_on_Thu=2C_Jul_02=2C_1998_at_07?=
 =?iso-8859-1?Q?=3A07=3A33AM_-0700?=
Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Thu, Jul 02, 1998 at 07:07:33AM -0700, Søren Schmidt wrote:
> sos         1998/07/02 07:07:32 PDT
> 
>   Modified files:
>     usr.bin/doscmd       intff.c 
>   Log:
>   Add missing ')'..
>   
>   Doesn't anybody TEST code before committing....
>   
>   This is the X'th time these laste couble of days...

Several of these has been problems with LKMs.  The problem is that we
don't honour dependencies properly, and the LKMs is built at the wrong
point (they should IMO just be the kernel object files).

Forgetting the LKMs come pretty naturally if you don't do a buildworld
for each kernel change (and many people don't - I've been one of
themw).  It is somewhat like you probably wouldn't do a buildworld for
a manpage change...

Eivind.