From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Apr 6 15:05:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC69B06EB4 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:05:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1A4182D for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DE56FB06EB3; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF76B06EB2 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: from mail-qg0-x22e.google.com (mail-qg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9667F182C for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2016 15:05:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jim@ohlste.in) Received: by mail-qg0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id f52so38247111qga.3 for ; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:05:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ohlste-in.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=J/dWdVTvK/mLGnCl30onsZP27hDLvqmAmdLzmPYxYaU=; b=pgOhzBT35slimPijnvsj9W6JRjOIFvHG1ubFiywarTEfGozg95GbaKyqBRV87wdJA+ mMrg1f1gZ+KIluDrnpHRzPoh9Izo3gG15XwZj4YYSbhDEm7RPQFDHOKPRyLX3/MO5Ha8 0rcJ/eUzDPmxRTRCtJsrQseg5Qb7uyvNYI9Fyf+z1IsxBtqCmiU0rwdAOW34p1mUGVcK wcT4sEG42BQJHKTYEaimeqv4FQ8vN5IA9Phb19G8mF4pvZkzcN/1s4KASHHLilJcVPJV 4m//lGTneQI4Vem8mnJ/5RQYWs4tdw0wCUlrXbQE99YGlb1NHHDNu6UgK4Jf39ZemN14 X+LQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=J/dWdVTvK/mLGnCl30onsZP27hDLvqmAmdLzmPYxYaU=; b=VvB1HnEZNj4HotBpDuB/FAJ9Ks+MrgJGVnN299kWgiBA5JB9p77WvZSVb9ihVjL5/2 yfV820jjPw5B/bNxV6U+U+g4hiq+GxtCzCk72degtbpc2eY6JpwVDrnkrjXnkjRTMt/n yyeVBkrH0zpkCFYLPphuJEm3IJErTXOtsI4WVGkEntLVXPsC3ohk8Zjw1lUljhvhNIQu bi+wXgcFavGICMwzrU6SDRE0n0kr/sa/9Qg96VuVgzo9KO3M+iGOTIeBXAz8Vey+FUk2 XrBJfARDABFiUYo8u49woQeTkJQ0B25C/itazaWBpinGiUNUl8nCZhOI+6wZWQTaOuch m7hA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJI2awtheIsZTdYwZuR4P0mIrNp6VfMFSLaFP5TPH06YSzz5mZTGwqKQ/4U7scKYXg== X-Received: by 10.140.242.77 with SMTP id n74mr25652764qhc.2.1459955148337; Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:05:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.13] (pool-96-249-243-37.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.249.243.37]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g64sm1424294qkb.44.2016.04.06.08.05.47 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Wed, 06 Apr 2016 08:05:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Committer needed for PR 208029 From: Jim Ohlstein X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13E238) In-Reply-To: <20160406144727.GP35640@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:05:46 -0400 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <15968328-7756-4053-822B-0DDB5CB07D37@ohlste.in> References: <498CA3F8-15EF-45BD-880C-241F83CBE3DD@waschbuesch.de> <20160405185159.GK35640@home.opsec.eu> <20160405200835.GM35640@home.opsec.eu> <57042958.5010701@sorbs.net> <20160406044431.GO35640@home.opsec.eu> <570517F1.5020305@ohlste.in> <20160406144727.GP35640@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 15:05:50 -0000 Hello, > On Apr 6, 2016, at 10:47 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> This is much ado about nothing. The "WITH_OPENSSL_PORT" option is there=20= >> for just this purpose and is used in many ports. >=20 > In 9.x this is sometimes a problem, if port X builds in variant 1 > and port Y depends/links on X, but builds in variant 2. So it's > a temporary solution for 9.x and will be solved when 9.x is EOL'ed. >=20 > I'm not sure how this is solved in 10.x/11.x, probably the base SSL > is much more up2date. >=20 >> Forcing users who want to use this port to use OpenSSL from ports for=20 >> ALL ports is overkill. >=20 >> Think about official packages. Are ALL packages built against OpenSSL=20 >> from ports, or only those that need them? It's the latter, of course.=20 >> Are they incompatible in production? No. >=20 > There are grey areas, and I guess it will be like that for 9.x. Not only 9.x. 10.x has OpenSSL 1.0.1. Some ports require 1.0.2 which is in p= orts. Openssl 1.1.0 is soon to be released but almost certainly won't be in 1= 1. It's likely to always be an issue. It's up to each individual maintainer t= o make certain his or her ports behave correctly if binaries link to one ano= ther. For a port like this the proper solution is to use the least intrusive= option.=20 -- Jim=