From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sat Dec 9 21:03:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93D8E98355 for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpaetzel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD6A5758EE for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 21:03:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpaetzel@FreeBSD.org) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A29E209AD for ; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:03:02 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 09 Dec 2017 16:03:02 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=SbLxXi UefTqtyBXJ30dZeI674icfXSwzdS0HbLfy2aY=; b=GqXo1wlHleyW9ZhGtWITJk OuCRgJEYl9vloWik5bemiD3cTltYumRrGdvUL8mUzg6HfVfdLSMjHcNU3K56yU8+ wmUphCNFKTvRR9Ph054k2lJOcuSmO9DC8YC5YO7LCLcS9bimh5kAPxGPs/nIKt+n qLH8E/eWpcrInoyeq5xJsBnl+DbjjBOwQAvSs/qFrDXbVrUaNtgnX7NYxrak2tzD 4dWHqXsPmczpb4aVjIJYETVGV9kTxQMVU6RBS/DQrACf2ueyHv+bijKY0MazPfN2 rPzRyV/3H0kqM6cSH7zqcHdaAZmjeNMjJ8uiATtXjam+X7zyYSa9Fy+BHNcldsXw == X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 762079E2C7; Sat, 9 Dec 2017 16:03:02 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1512853382.1168879.1199681584.2730528F@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-c9e5630e References: <5A2C479B.1040400@grosbein.net> Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 15:03:02 -0600 Subject: Re: [Bug 122954] [lagg] IPv6 EUI64 incorrectly chosen for lagg devices In-Reply-To: <5A2C479B.1040400@grosbein.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2017 21:03:05 -0000 On Sat, Dec 9, 2017, at 02:29 PM, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > 10.12.2017 1:29, bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org wrote: > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=122954 > > > > Josh Paetzel changed: > > > > What |Removed |Added > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Status|In Progress |Closed > > CC| |jpaetzel@FreeBSD.org > > Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events > > > > One should not just close PRs without any descriptive commentary no > matter how old it is. > The same applies to > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118727 > > Please add some comments why did you closed them. > The bug tracking system is in poor shape right now due to an enormous backlog of bugs in it that will never get addressed. While I agree that it would be great to add comments to each bug I close if I closed even 100 bugs a day and no one added any new bugs it will be 4 months before I get just the kern category cleaned up. I do intend to start adding comments once I get to FreeBSD 8 era bugs. So there's hope. To be honest a bug that has had no activity in 10 years kinda speaks for itself. Maybe we can get the bugzilla maintainers to add a "closed because no one gave a f***" category to help people figure out what is going on. :) Thanks for your feedback. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel