From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 15 17:10:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93CE91065672 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:10:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglist@ucwv.edu) Received: from mail.ucwv.edu (mail.ucwv.edu [216.30.201.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62AA28FC27 for ; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:10:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.ucwv.edu ([172.16.0.15]) by mail.ucwv.edu ([172.16.0.15]) with mapi; Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:10:09 -0400 From: mailinglist To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 13:08:23 -0400 Thread-Topic: Portsnap vs cvsup Thread-Index: AQHKxGJdP/45T67OMEesyC5nRfqwjA== Message-ID: <93C575B79E9B01449EBBB084032BC5701248B8C0ED@mail.ucwv.edu> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Portsnap vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 17:10:33 -0000 What is the difference between using portsnap and cvsupping a ports supfile= ? The last time I really used FreeBSD was several years ago, but it seems = that portsnap has replaced "cvsup ports-supfile". What exactly is the diff= erence between the two? What makes portsnap the better option?