Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 15:35:37 -0800 (PST) From: David Wolfskill <david@catwhisker.org> To: freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 88 Consulting -- *BSD-based server solutions Message-ID: <200203132335.g2DNZbJ72781@bunrab.catwhisker.org> In-Reply-To: <200203131442.g2DEgTv30343@jhs.muc.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Subject: Re: 88 Consulting -- *BSD-based server solutions >From: "Julian Stacey" <jhs@bim.bsn.com> >Reply-To: freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG >Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 15:42:29 +0100 >I suggest a vote to split this <freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG> into 2 lists: > <freebsd-jobs-wanted@FreeBSD.ORG> # inc. URLs of CV/ Resumes From Individuals > <freebsd-jobs-offered@FreeBSD.ORG> # Job Descriptions From Employers >.... Unless/until there's a great deal more traffic on this list, I fail to see a problem worth solving by such a split. >What do others think ? > - Yes, Split. > - No, Do not split. >Replies to <freebsd-jobs@FreeBSD.ORG> please. I'd vote against, for now. Note that traditionally, most lists @freebsd.org are sufficiently open that non-subscribers may post to them, and that they are not moderated. There are, however, filters for certain tell-tale indicators of abuse (from what I gather from communications with postmaster@). I'll also note that following-up in this list is pretty much off-topic, IMO. Cheers, david (links to my resume at http://www.catwhisker.org/~david) -- David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org I believe it would be irresponsible (and thus, unethical) for me to advise, recommend, or support the use of any product that is or depends on any Microsoft product for any purpose other than personal amusement. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-jobs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203132335.g2DNZbJ72781>