Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2003 13:10:59 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> To: "Jukka A. Ukkonen" <jau@mawit.com> Cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users <gnome@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Message-ID: <1061399458.703.1.camel@gyros> In-Reply-To: <3233.62.78.135.6.1061393191.squirrel@office.mawit.com> References: <3233.62.78.135.6.1061393191.squirrel@office.mawit.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--=-KL8PnwkcdCFyAJmGYDYX Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 2003-08-20 at 11:26, Jukka A. Ukkonen wrote: > Hi! >=20 > Obviously nobody has really tried to use the "package" >=20 > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-stable/All/glib-2.2= .2.tgz >=20 > because it is actually not a package but the source tar file. Please, rep= lace > it with > a real package instead. As it is now it breaks any and all chances for > pkg_update. If you're tracking releases (i.e. 5.1-RELEASE, 4.8-RELEASE), then it's safe to go with packages. However, if you're tracking a dynamic branch such as -STABLE or -CURRENT, you should really be using ports. In that case, please see the second part of: http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/faq2.html#q1 Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-KL8PnwkcdCFyAJmGYDYX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/Q6uib2iPiv4Uz4cRAtG7AJ401nGvfeYxLNaAO0o+wFiYFjE5UgCaAkN3 SZ6slqulUCoiI4p9KPuzRFk= =uHHJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-KL8PnwkcdCFyAJmGYDYX--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1061399458.703.1.camel>