From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 1 16:37:40 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB0C16A41F for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:37:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: from graf.pompo.net (graf.pompo.net [81.56.186.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9C543D46 for ; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 16:37:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thierry@pompo.net) Received: by graf.pompo.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B0D957512; Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 18:37:12 +0200 From: Thierry Thomas To: Paul Schmehl Message-ID: <20050801163712.GA9070@graf.pompo.net> Mail-Followup-To: Paul Schmehl , ports@freebsd.org, Sam Lawrance References: <2E1EC4D96E17CB668506B6A5@utd59514.utdallas.edu> <1122910887.789.15.camel@dirk.no.domain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1122910887.789.15.camel@dirk.no.domain> X-Face: (hRbQnK~Pt7$ct`!fupO(`y_WL4^-Iwn4@ly-.,[4xC4xc; y=\ipKMNm<1J>lv@PP~7Z<.t KjAnXLs: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE i386 Organization: Kabbale Eros X-PGP: 0xC71405A2 Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Sam Lawrance Subject: Re: PR machine broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Aug 2005 16:37:40 -0000 Le Lun 1 aoû 05 à 17:41:27 +0200, Sam Lawrance écrivait : > On Mon, 2005-08-01 at 10:20 -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote: > > I submitted an update to x11-toolkits/iwidgets over the weekend. I have > > still not received the obligatory bot response. I'm also having no luck > > querying the PRs for anything I've submitted recently. > > > > Is the PR machine broken? > > Hmm. Well, it's there: > > Subject: > ports/84369: new port, > x11-toolkits/iwidgets, replacement > for existing port, *not* a patch By the way, this is really an update, and the RCS tag must be preserved. You should resubmit it as a patch, because it will be committed this way, and we want to keep the history in CVS. I had a quick look at this port, and noted something strange: it depends on both tcl/tk 83 and 84; is that normal? CATEGORIES are set to tk83... Regards, -- Th. Thomas.