From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 19 10:48:24 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7ADB16A41F for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE [134.93.178.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5860743D46 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:48:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ohartman@mail.uni-mainz.de) Received: from [213.6.69.6] (A4506.a.pppool.de [213.6.69.6]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailgate2.zdv.Uni-Mainz.DE (Postfix) with ESMTP id 688823000337 for ; Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:48:02 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4305B88D.3030202@mail.uni-mainz.de> Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 12:46:37 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" Organization: Institut =?ISO-8859-1?Q?f=FCr_Geophysik?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050724) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at uni-mainz.de Subject: portsnap, only for ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 10:48:24 -0000 Hello. I have some questions about portsnap. The intention of portsnap seems to be reasonable. But I miss a similar facility updating the operating system! One of the major arguments using portsnap is to avoid the intrusion of malicous code, injected via a 'man in the middle'. Thinking of so called root-kits it makes more sense to me securing the updates of source code of the operating system also or at first place. Are there any plans doing so? Or alternatives? I still use CVS updating the source code. Oliver