From owner-svn-ports-all@freebsd.org Tue Mar 20 15:56:02 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87481F5808E; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@absolight.fr) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 16DAE79496; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@absolight.fr) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5E1BDD25; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:55:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from gw.in.absolight.net (gw-ecl.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.69]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.in.absolight.net", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C98C3BDD1E; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:55:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) by gw.in.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0246151; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:55:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by ogg.in.absolight.net (Postfix, from userid 501) id DB70E61B5EB5; Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:55:57 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 16:55:57 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: Mathieu Arnold , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r464889 - in head/sysutils/cpupdate: . files Message-ID: <20180320155557.5leyphzghg7mju4c@ogg.in.absolight.net> References: <201803181027.w2IARJw3075413@repo.freebsd.org> <20180320084708.27t2g6cfvb7us7zq@atuin.in.mat.cc> <5AB12297.2090101@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="g32vuc6wbuplp4g3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5AB12297.2090101@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20171215 X-BeenThere: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2018 15:56:02 -0000 --g32vuc6wbuplp4g3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 10:02:47PM +0700, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > On 20.03.2018 15:47, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >=20 > > On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 10:27:19AM +0000, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > >> Author: eugen > >> Date: Sun Mar 18 10:27:19 2018 > >> New Revision: 464889 > >> URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/464889 > >> > >> Log: > >> sysutils/cpupdate: - correct ONLY_FOR_ARCHS_REASON message; > >> =20 > >> - be more specific in the COMMENT and pkg-descr: mention x86-centric= ity; > >> =20 > >> - in addition to CPM option, add INTEL convinience option to ease > >=20 > > I am not sure I understand why those are non default options (and why > > they are options at all, in fact) as they both seem to have important > > content that people will need. > =20 > All installed files must be added to pkg-plist and therefore included int= o the package. > However, platomav/CPUMicrocodes is really distinct project and its growth= is not syncronized with cpupdate. Then maybe this one should be in its own port? > More serious problem may steam from copyright issues: Intel's license all= ows > end users to utilize published CPU microcodes but I do not know if FreeBS= D project > has special permission to package and redistribute Intel's microcode file= s. >=20 > Intel's general licence does not permit redistribution and > I do not want to limit redistribution of cpupdate package itself > due to copyrighted blobs added to the package. I do not know about licensing issues. My point is that providing a package without the microcodes does not seem to make a lot of sense to me. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --g32vuc6wbuplp4g3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJasS8NXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IM1UP/R/YIrcIYrIjaBIb2gFNWEeH /m5QYqwSr6L9WZDZ53uic70ozluX6+aCqur/ss+5jkmH452YHbjcszw/yxWFRVKP SKOqV4Tmirohh6liaTOLc0tV/zj6lRxm0vmPXi6GOi+27Q10d/0Q2SbLX9FwL8EX HIKQubaApVmtMYzD10jNYdsKC56Vf5IiJU07MG+pKR2Jvj4P+1uhCVntFSaGHf/f m/YCrRSqYzxctLgZbcKO6nPG3E7PShtkY5ihipwn+dE6xYTjwSeXwpsX08/w3jlD wMQbZ6IUdgGk+P4j3wAZbBHX/nlmJEY4MfeprUUqx3dKywXt08lNk2xqP5glZmp6 15i2Is4rRN5+LmanXt5DZc4cYsCCzWEiIp4h6w0rjLiPKVF+2RL6RUDGUw2Hm1l+ +WgtaWJWYNaEOfOeXy8Fy45DVBwIKTHZZk9JCfBb0277Rl9O/uvxFirmMD74dCsD 0wrL9NA8hutbbzuPq0heSQvQBzLmlfrJwE7ZFvSDfVJfBbKxVRBub1JRltvStuJZ LqyhJqihH2612rNafMP/phYiIPnCAgCqeXqxioHYEPLrg+JBN4AffFN+HkVOJVgp szUsSfrsDOQ++BnfwD03drVliAcDfNWPeobCiJLUHh8QctjR10Z27KoOL7foFwum ha/OAj/tYN78eRJm/HJi =mpZB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --g32vuc6wbuplp4g3--