From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu May 1 13:30:32 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C035E37B401 for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 13:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pa-plum1b-166.pit.adelphia.net (pa-plum1a-215.pit.adelphia.net [24.53.170.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A2543FAF for ; Thu, 1 May 2003 13:30:31 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from potentialtech.com (working [172.16.0.95]) h41KUU0n005938; Thu, 1 May 2003 16:30:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Message-ID: <3EB183E6.7090008@potentialtech.com> Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 16:30:30 -0400 From: Bill Moran User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gcn53@vfemail.net References: <1051818955.3eb17bcb36c53@www.vfemail.net> <002a01c3101f$026267e0$ca0110ac@vinyl.tkvbp.com> <1051820707.3eb182a3273f6@www.vfemail.net> In-Reply-To: <1051820707.3eb182a3273f6@www.vfemail.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with networking? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 May 2003 20:30:33 -0000 gcn53@vfemail.net wrote: > Quoting Kliment Andreev : >>Send us : >> >># ifconfig -a > > fxp0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 > inet 209.237.255.52 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.237.255.52 > ether 00:03:47:e7:53:ff > media: Ethernet 10baseT/UTP > status: active > lp0: flags=8810 mtu 1500 > faith0: flags=8002 mtu 1500 > lo0: flags=8049 mtu 16384 > ppp0: flags=8010 mtu 1500 > sl0: flags=c010 mtu 552 That netmask looks pretty wrong. Something like ffffff00 sounds more reasonable, although I can't be sure whether that's right either. I can think of a very limited number of cases where the primary IP on an ethernet card should have the netmask you have. Verify it. -- Bill Moran Potential Technologies http://www.potentialtech.com