From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Jun  4 23:26:28 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp [210.234.123.18])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C4BB237B72E; Sun,  4 Jun 2000 23:26:24 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from knu@idaemons.org)
Received: from daemon.local.idaemons.org (203-165-77-40.sugnm1.kt.home.ne.jp [203.165.77.40])
	by ms.tokyo.jcom.ne.jp (8.9.3/3.7W 04/27/00) with ESMTP id PAA18486;
	Mon, 5 Jun 2000 15:25:31 +0900 (JST)
Received: by daemon.local.idaemons.org (8.9.3/3.7W) id PAA70551; Mon, 5 Jun 2000 15:24:59 +0900 (JST)
Date: Mon, 05 Jun 2000 15:24:57 +0900
Message-ID: <86u2f8bq6e.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>
From: "Akinori -Aki- MUSHA" <knu@idaemons.org>
To: lioux@uol.com.br
Cc: hetzels@westbend.net, asami@FreeBSD.ORG, ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NOPORTDOCS handling
In-Reply-To: In your message of "Sun, 4 Jun 2000 01:24:53 -0300"
	<20000604012453.A446@Fedaykin.here>
References: <200006021931.MAA67682@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
	<200006031234.OAA13213@peedub.muc.de>
	<20000603144658.A7092@Fedaykin.here>
	<00a901bfcd8a$e6b0f180$8dfee0d1@westbend.net>
	<20000604012453.A446@Fedaykin.here>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/1.1.2 (Raspberry Beret) EMIKO/1.13.12 (Euglena sociabilis) FLIM/1.13.2 (Kasanui) APEL/10.2 MULE XEmacs/21.1 (patch 9) (Canyonlands) (i386--freebsd)
Organization: Associated I. Daemons
X-PGP-Public-Key: finger knu@FreeBSD.org
X-PGP-Fingerprint: 1BEF D9B2 BABD 25D7 659A  FD08 89C2 F3BE E981 4E16
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by EMIKO 1.13.12 - "Euglena sociabilis")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

At Sun, 4 Jun 2000 01:24:53 -0300,
lioux@uol.com.br wrote:
> 	@ldconfig
> 	@ldunconfig
> 
> 	These would simplify all libraries. Who mentioned cpp?
> 	That really sounds marvelous, however, do we desire
> the extra level of complexity? I do, but do the others?

I'd like it too.

Also I wish we'd have something instead of:

	@unexec rmdir %D/foo/bar 2>/dev/null || true

which cannot look but only a workaround due to lack of a directive
that does remove a directory if empty.

Maybe, we could extend @dirrm to accept some options like `-i' ?
(Ignore errors)

-- 
                           /
                          /__  __       
                         / )  )  ) )  /
Akinori -Aki- MUSHA aka / (_ /  ( (__(  @ idaemons.org / FreeBSD.org

"We're only at home when we're on the run, on the wing, on the fly"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message