From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 16 11:21:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8431016A4CE for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:21:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11F7A43D64 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 11:21:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0GJJUUd096008 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:19:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i0GJJUmA096005 for ; Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:19:30 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 14:19:30 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: arch@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: Signal delivery to kernel threads/processes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 19:21:30 -0000 On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Robert Watson wrote: > On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Robert Watson wrote: > > > if (p->p_flag & P_SYSTEM) > > return (EPERM); > > Another possible interpretation, not quite the same, might be to use > P_KTHREAD. And, to add insult to injury by following up to my post yet another time: init has P_SYSTEM set, so P_KTHREAD is a much better choice. Either that or introduce a P_KERNEL flag. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research