From owner-freebsd-arch Wed Jan 30 1:57:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7826C37B405 for ; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 01:57:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 16VrWa-000GSH-00; Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:59:28 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: Poul-Henning Kamp Cc: Terry Lambert , Jordan Hubbard , Dallas De Atley , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: __P macro question In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:41:01 +0100." <21003.1012383661@critter.freebsd.dk> Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:59:28 +0200 Message-ID: <63256.1012384768@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 10:41:01 +0100, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Plenty of innocent electrons have been wasted in the last 10 years > trying to prove that that the set "Terrys problems", is the most > important subset of the set "The FreeBSD projects problems", but > so far no evidence has been found to support this claim. As much as I don't like the look of the __P() construct, surely it's worthwhile if it means our code is easier to port to odd little embedded systems? Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message