From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 14 07:51:01 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CC037B401 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailhub.yumyumyum.org (dsl092-171-091.wdc2.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.92.171.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195C843FA3 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 07:51:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from culverk@yumyumyum.org) Received: by mailhub.yumyumyum.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5939156; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailhub.yumyumyum.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5518D18; Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:50:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 10:50:46 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth Culver To: "J. Seth Henry" In-Reply-To: <1060871994.5979.12.camel@alexandria> Message-ID: <20030814104618.T20039@alpha.yumyumyum.org> References: <1060871994.5979.12.camel@alexandria> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD as router - performance vs hardware routers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 14:51:02 -0000 > What I'm not sure about is performance. Has anyone built a cable modem > gateway router using FreeBSD and "low-end" hardware like this? If so, > what were your results? > I'm using mine for DSL on a PII 333 and I've not seen any performance problems other than some that were the ISP's fault (recently fixed). I'm running FreeBSD-CURRENT on that machine, and aside from the once per month that I update it to the latest -CURRENT, I have no problems. You'd probably want to use one of the -RELEASE's or -STABLE if you want it to "just work." On my router I'm running postfix (actually writing the mail on that machine right now), dhcpd, DNS, and using ipfilter/ipnat for NAT and firewall capabilities, and using dummynet for some basic QoS type stuff. Works great with no performance problems. Ken