From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Tue Jan 30 13:53:25 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C235ECB8A7; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:53:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp02.mail.online.nl (smtp02.mail.online.nl [194.134.25.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D63506D60B; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:53:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adridg@freebsd.org) Received: from a-pc.localnet (s55969a9e.adsl.online.nl [85.150.154.158]) by smtp02.mail.online.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 322EE1A004A; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 14:53:22 +0100 (CET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: ports-committers@freebsd.org Cc: svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r460298 - in head: devel/alabastra Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 08:53:21 -0500 Message-ID: <3784572.LY0cXeFHoe@a-pc> Organization: FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <20180129150955.GA31811@FreeBSD.org> References: <201801291256.w0TCu0Q5035974@repo.freebsd.org> <20180129150955.GA31811@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart2144209.T8OEKkrLmd"; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 13:53:25 -0000 --nextPart2144209.T8OEKkrLmd Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" On Monday, January 29, 2018 10:09:56 AM EST Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > > +++ head/devel/alabastra/Makefile Mon Jan 29 12:56:00 2018 > > (r460298) @@ -11,6 +11,9 @@ DISTNAME= Alabastra-${PORTVERSION} > > MAINTAINER= ports@FreeBSD.org > > COMMENT= C++ editor written with Qt 4 > > > > +DEPRECATED= Abandonware, not used in the ports tree > > +EXPIRATION_DATE= 2018-03-01 > > This is a leaf port: the fact that it's not used in the ports tree is not > relevant. It also fetches, builds, and runs fine. Why deprecate it? While it's all fun to have lots of things in the ports collection, you can also ask yourself if a software product that last saw an update to 0.21 -- last commits seem to be in 2009 on sourceforge -- which relies on a toolkit that reached end-of-life in 2015, with plenty of alternatives, and with no port maintainer, really should live on. By all means, Mat, deprecate and move on. If someone actively cares, it can be picked up again. Just about anything without a maintainer, and USE_QT4, should be ready for deprecation. (Which reminds me that audio/rosegarden, for instance, needs an update, should be handed to kde@, and switched to defaulting to Qt5) [ade] --nextPart2144209.T8OEKkrLmd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iF4EABEIAAYFAlpweNEACgkQMu5UWj4IU091QwD9HbSNtZGWyHHpGxMq4LrfRwrp Mdxo2fb+oZ7I+PuPc6UBALGIcvKHNsKq4dS/jrU4YFfXqPG/XMs8yD73wkh2ITyt =eIKz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart2144209.T8OEKkrLmd--