Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2018 00:42:13 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 225780] www/caddy: missing documentation Message-ID: <bug-225780-13-hXsWPk6Q9q@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-225780-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-225780-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D225780 Fabian Freyer <fabian.freyer@physik.tu-berlin.de> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fabian.freyer@physik.tu-ber | |lin.de --- Comment #3 from Fabian Freyer <fabian.freyer@physik.tu-berlin.de> --- It seems there is an issue [1] open for this upstream, my apologies for mis= sing that earlier. I'll include the manpage once it exists upstream. I wasn't aware that software shipping any man pages or other documentation = were out of scope for the ports tree, and that inclusion of such would be settin= g a dangerous precedent. On a quick, cursory, re-visitation of the Porter's Handbook [2], I didn't find any policies there - did I miss something, or is this some sort of unwritten rule? I agree that including documentation where possible is always beneficial. Where would you suggest installing the README.md[3] and/or how would you suggest referencing the online documentation[4]? [1]=C2=A0https://github.com/mholt/caddy/issues/1876 [2] https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/ [3] https://github.com/mholt/caddy/blob/master/README.md [4] https://caddyserver.com/docs --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-225780-13-hXsWPk6Q9q>