From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 12 13:01:57 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E89A106567B for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778268FC2C for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from florent.thoumie@gmail.com) Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k17so3367383waf.3 for ; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; bh=GAsUSeYpQ72qTa2Q3jkz2abiOqGCA1PZQuPlVM50RFk=; b=ffL3cbcsvDbDzptXKgRogfelvDVdr5KUbWBfUQ8czyZ7zDSa18QNjaNi/t3qRbbnahq7qcTq6vOCSOGORLWpDXtT0kXL2atdOygP8SLLIqTH9u3GuyG8qS7N6eBVZzo+6FLtO16qSl1NKouDcnewD4sym0dFUMTeTbQ60kaiWcA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references:x-google-sender-auth; b=oZewLI2RnIsji5fUonZ4Y5PkJsI+T/Z5cnXRYZiv6jn6AevY4j1lCY3MkeGYniXzGFQnL7UqYEMi4nDoXCDfI/HFjM9BZ6/ZXqtbmr6oYSWWV8xyrlAMu/Hx7/SQyxhlL7+IoSyXTdRqew0c2ERiiyY5e55UiyOQ4Y4aqYboUK8= Received: by 10.114.183.1 with SMTP id g1mr7001644waf.3.1205326917061; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.61.15 with HTTP; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 06:01:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:01:57 +0000 From: "Florent Thoumie" Sender: florent.thoumie@gmail.com To: "Benjamin Lutz" In-Reply-To: <200803121311.51383.mail@maxlor.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200803121311.51383.mail@maxlor.com> X-Google-Sender-Auth: ba47021f2a7afb34 Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/113132 (make -j patch) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 13:01:57 -0000 On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Benjamin Lutz wrote: > This patch has been sitting in GNATS for a couple of months now: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/113132 > > I've received a few mails from people reporting success, and none > reporting that bad things have happened. Is it possible to get this > committed? It needs to go through an experimental build first. IMHO, this is an ugly hack. Ultimately, we're talking about marking almost 20k ports as parallel-safe. Why not taking the opposite approach? Allow it by default, figure out which ports break and why, fix where possible? -- Florent Thoumie flz@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD Committer