Date: Mon, 6 Oct 1997 10:08:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamie Bowden <jamie@itribe.net> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UUCP (important clarification) Message-ID: <199710061405.KAA27927@gatekeeper.itribe.net> In-Reply-To: <199710061102.HAA01674@i4got.lakewood.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 6 Oct 1997, Bill Pechter wrote: > > > Who can decide on this? Is there a conspiracy behind it? ;-) > > > > Given that I don't particularly *care* about UUCP in the first place, > > I really don't mind what goes into 2.2.5 as far as this is concerned. > > > > Anyone masochistic enough to still use UUCP in this day and age is > > also capable of fixing any breakage that may occur, I think. Go for it. ;) > > > > Jordan > > > > Masochistic 8-) > > UUCP is much easier to configure than, say gated.conf! > > Bill I found gated much easier to deal with than UUCP. Must be an individual thing. Jamie Bowden System Administrator, iTRiBE.net Abusenet: The Misinformation Superhighway
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710061405.KAA27927>