From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Jun 8 04:36:26 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110933419F7 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:36:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49gL6w6wlzz4RM4 for ; Mon, 8 Jun 2020 04:36:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r56.edvax.de ([94.222.25.204]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue009 [212.227.15.167]) with ESMTPA (Nemesis) id 1MYeV1-1jVDLq21dD-00VeWt; Mon, 08 Jun 2020 06:36:21 +0200 Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2020 06:36:20 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Wesley Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd vs. netbsd Message-Id: <20200608063620.244f5aee.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <0fee3973-287b-c2da-8443-92403aa90881@freenetMail.de> References: <171506d5-19aa-359e-c21d-f07257c52ebd@freenetMail.de> <20200608051434.ca70e5c5.freebsd@edvax.de> <0fee3973-287b-c2da-8443-92403aa90881@freenetMail.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K1:6bGpCuqyI7fetngVS+saF9cfFc0Fuk5oDUwWpaLD1eyRBPyC3y/ guuzmpc5NjAM181wpK3iWK1KNsbVDReeUwLnqZTzyKBgvhc+p0kwSzvMmpnttGPbUvsvBTG +qOndSsFgaPi+14qifTSdX7Ycx+Bu4wb72xI0NY0NvPo6mA1L2J7RCdET/oGpSxBuKbwFbV yn/KvtqE9O8PLmzrb+WqQ== X-Spam-Flag: NO X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V03:K0:+36tz2l9GBc=:icR4at0SAPNxiWIj1Rb9ON TKc5zr2diMz8eFsnSwIamneYpa1npfbDf4zjUGdsPWK1CYXIM5t1/3QebyggJChol0C/kTVQp oQ+fjkdFJLwWsXdm34YshiuyY11AfanemAJ8VBrfwVz30yOQLv5rTiQ9PIdkNlIYSLwJWW+ox YFhMarDbvlLkOriMYSZv/V5k8EkwDZ57fWrtihgNLRpXvvDk4TwVz6yETdvxflQhPPB4twZGD SRFd9vk2wJhalOxL/HDsB5Rm5N7BGyWvFPrQVyApK8lCyMGGM9dN/MMgeDTRLqcXMCiRLjp1m iLv9qlmUAjIW+C53pSphsT/QKGwI1SMJ9w4nD5B7ba55Bo1xvFmq1wh5hYrJW2AyGmPVreHsJ thCplSF0FfX35JELvVm1FDsYSTEy49pwVVzGQ3n69HTDcarCKiPXwK+j7/aeo0CzGWJfJpIbx 5QmQ1rFBvWb6Z7lznZMM2k+W8LD2K0Fa3brPsPVSckBX96JC5z3ZJv6Adxgc8WQ2Mc+a4liJu Jx2E2ltMESBmFyen/3lq9uKjCdDfEOlZstZM/gGX+H8GGCqBbeyPBKfcY+H+EcKSHlxGGeLMT luNBXf0iyPeiGHdUZmWBRvZLjxigLWGag18nXAFUdkk+PCz92dZ2tCMbWRf00M5iX3wMjX/Lj BJc3K9a9GWu0RL4P6Ha6DYPbzBmJW4CKNvLq9x/gBvX+qqiX9SygRYN34/5pSJ+uGLUT+x+s3 hzaPu2JzlzjIhGStZvIQo6G2GSFNJzKR1WwL7viSTcsywyTAeTltRAnnIiwbnIFwXxbNzYmzA L5/u6WxetTiELWOKgyFUC8dR4SmYX4TCGZqPGhzYqBk4n8+22SYcf3iT5ZKRTRpYP0PZYME X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49gL6w6wlzz4RM4 X-Spamd-Bar: ++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of freebsd@edvax.de has no SPF policy when checking 212.227.126.133) smtp.mailfrom=freebsd@edvax.de X-Spamd-Result: default: False [2.13 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[freebsd@edvax.de]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; HAS_ORG_HEADER(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.30)[-0.297]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[94.222.25.204:received]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:8560, ipnet:212.227.0.0/16, country:DE]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.55)[-0.551]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[edvax.de]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.58)[0.582]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MID_CONTAINS_FROM(1.00)[]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[212.227.126.133:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[212.227.126.133:from]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Jun 2020 04:36:26 -0000 On Mon, 8 Jun 2020 12:07:08 +0800, Wesley wrote: > > > On 2020/6/8 上午 11:14, Polytropon wrote: > >> what are their use scenes then? > > Oversimplified: NetBSD is the candidate for "runs everywhere", > > so it's very useful for embedded systems and "strange" hardware > > platforms; OpenBSD has security as primary goal, that makes it > > perfect for servers; FreeBSD is also used for embedded, servers, > > and desktops. In an attempt to summarize, all the BSDs can be > > used for almost everything - from embedded, to laptops, desktops, > > servers, and "combined forms". In reality, you_will_ find BSDs > > in all those places, and you will also find them in places where > > you don't know there is a BSD running, for example in routers, > > managed switches, NAS, WLAN APs, firewall and other networking > > appliances. They are also used as development platforms for a > > lot of other systems. > > > Thank you so much Polytropon. > > Do these three have difference on package management? Yes. They use their own package creation and distribution system. However, those systems work "somewhat similar". https://www.freebsd.org/ports/ https://www.openbsd.org/faq/faq15.html https://www.netbsd.org/docs/software/packages.html The you use are of course a bit different, but technically, they aim to achieve the same goals. The system TrueOS, ex PC-BSD, derived from FreeBSD, had its own format: PBI = push button install, which was a kind of "everything in one file -> into one subdirectory". > For example, Ubuntu use apt, Centos use yum for package management. > Though their main purpose are similar, but usage is different. Exactly. The same applies for the BSDs. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...