From owner-freebsd-questions Wed May 29 19:25:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from altair.mukappabeta.net (altair.mukappabeta.net [194.145.150.157]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929EF37B406 for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 19:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by altair.mukappabeta.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B2C4A6BF; Thu, 30 May 2002 04:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 30 May 2002 04:26:09 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow To: Dan Nelson Cc: Peter Leftwich , FreeBSD LIST Subject: Re: mv vs. tar Message-ID: <20020530022609.GA956@altair.mukappabeta.net> References: <20020529210249.J77775-100000@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <20020530021219.GA78068@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020530021219.GA78068@dan.emsphone.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dan Nelson writes: >A tar pipe will be much faster, since reading and writing will be >overlapped. > >( cd /source ; tar cf - . ) | ( cd destination ; tar xfp - ) eh? sorry but I think that's nonsense. --mkb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message