Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 22:26:40 +0100 From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi@freebsd.jazztel.es> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: vim-lite-6.3.16 Message-ID: <200411212226.41107.freebsd@redesjm.local> In-Reply-To: <20041121205219.GA1154@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <41A01DF9.9090607@sc.rr.com> <200411211941.15515.freebsd@redesjm.local> <20041121205219.GA1154@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 21:52, David O'Brien escribi=F3: > On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 07:41:14PM +0100, Jose M Rodriguez wrote: > > El Domingo, 21 de Noviembre de 2004 18:27, David O'Brien escribi?: > > > > cp> On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 06:06:27AM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote: > > > > William Allison p??e v so 20. 11. 2004 v 23:47 -0500: > > > > > I'm sorry but I can't seem to figure this out and haven't > > > > > been able to get help on IRC. > > > > > > > > [ ... ] > > > > > > I would more than welcome a patch for a tested vim-gtk (or > > > vim-gtk2) slave port[*] that I could review and test. > > > > I use this locally for weeks > > This isn't a slave port. See vim-lite for an example of what I mean. > Also your patch un-portlint's the Makefile more than it already is. my vim-gtk2 is a repo-copy of vim-lite. And it gets a very usable=20 vim-gtk2 binary package. But It's mixed with more changes to vim (PR ports/72067) I allways pretend maintain actual port way to do the things. If you=20 pretend other works, let me know. =2D- josemi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200411212226.41107.freebsd>