From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 19:14:39 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE8A37B401 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:14:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35A9F43FDF for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:14:38 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: (qmail 47947 invoked from network); 27 Jun 2003 02:14:37 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (192.168.188.241) by 0 with SMTP; 27 Jun 2003 02:14:37 -0000 Message-ID: <3EFBA88C.5020904@tenebras.com> Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2003 19:14:36 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i386; en-US; rv:1.3.1) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, zh-tw, zh-cn, fr, en, de-de MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Julian Elischer References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Robert Watson cc: Adam cc: net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bandwidth monitoring X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 02:14:39 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > I'm not sure I understand why not just tell ipfw to count all packets > that an ISP is likely to charge for and have the tables 'reaped every > now and then by a daemon to give a time dimension to the data.. That was my thought, though the OP isn't using ipfw, and I'm woefully ignorant (and mostly uninterested) in ipfilter. You could just as your ISP for access to the SNMP MIB that they're using to bill you.