From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Jul 17 19:42:14 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA05634 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 17 Jul 1995 19:42:14 -0700 Received: from vespucci.iquest.com (root@vespucci.iquest.com [199.170.120.42]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA05628 for ; Mon, 17 Jul 1995 19:42:09 -0700 Received: from [204.177.193.231] (n4hhe.iquest.com [204.177.193.231]) by vespucci.iquest.com (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA04518; Mon, 17 Jul 1995 21:42:10 -0500 Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Mon, 17 Jul 1995 21:42:01 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ('freebsd-questions@freebsd.org') From: dkelly@iquest.com (David Kelly) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Cc: zippy@smtpgate.gstone.com (Alcaraz, Walter S.) Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk At 11:55 7/17/95, Alcaraz, Walter S. wrote: >With all these people reporting problems with FreeBSD 2.0.5, should I >wait >until FreeBSD 2.1 comes out before buying the CD from Walnut Creek? I am >running FreeBSD 2.0 just fine right now. That might be one way to look at it. Another way to look at it is that those of us who have 2.0.5 running are quiet because everything is just peachy. The early 2.0.5-ALPHA's were a pain. But the one that worked for me was the last (I think) ALPHA before release. It works well, I'll stick with it for a while unless someone has a good reason to change. -- David Kelly N4HHE, n4hhe@amsat.org, dkelly@iquest.com ============================================================= The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.