From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 4 22:36:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B499A451; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:36:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22b.google.com (mail-we0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22b]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EB36CF; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 22:36:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f171.google.com with SMTP id u54so5085807wey.2 for ; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=gIOyC/nZKOQUEQGDCOP0rCItTtyFHvCVbqU0/ZTgbcU=; b=zUGqJD0AaueoOnLJbUSNhMXN5fxouAYjU+GN2SCQyQLKJZsh2h7C7tEfGCSyHJAk4k 2I3K69+rLqxVfmJP9yrgmGQBvBmiSEqFVoaQx9ytepHwvCi9zGvvG7VDDeXHpfawWq4r tE4iI4PUO5xt2ygIp3UK/GuMzpNMfrIJlGgupG2lJLzUK09D4yZ+p7p5lcJ+Ae8FNhWe 8TxOZFqn2Z7DitILrE2pymNi+LMSr3NhW87393E0o0qHAMUdiNKWu2UFy/uaWy/0dO3D C6pDr73qfdLt6cmTUq8Hk96WTEsD8Sm4BbhpFybDag8QQiFSBWUfoLKhb+9dsin1hjSJ GAyQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.8.197 with SMTP id t5mr12641591wia.27.1360017394300; Mon, 04 Feb 2013 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.172.197 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Feb 2013 14:36:34 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2013 00:36:34 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: stable/9 r245439 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9 (WAS: CLANG 3.2 breaks security/pam_ssh_agent_auth on stable/9) From: Kimmo Paasiala To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Mark Linimon , Brooks Davis , Dimitry Andric , Stefan Bethke , FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:36:36 -0000 On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 7:22 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 3 February 2013 17:15, Stefan Bethke wrote: >> >> Am 03.02.2013 um 10:57 schrieb Chris Rees : >> >>> On 3 February 2013 03:55, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: >>>> >>>> There is no PR yet with my fix and therefor no commit to ports tree >>>> that would fix the problem. I'll file a PR soon (TM). >>> >>> The problem was in base, and is fixed there. >> >> Huh? With -current r246283, I still get a segfault from sudo unless I have Kimmo's patch. >> >> Is there some confusion about which problem is addressed by Kimmo's patch? >> > > Hm, perhaps it might be necessary then. > > Kimmo, please would you submit the patch you had as a PR? I'm sure > Wesley would appreciate the hint. > > Chris I'll file a PR when I have recovered from a nasty flu. Right now I'm not fit for thinking... I changed the title of this thread to a better one. -Kimmo