From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 16 00:06:05 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E326106564A for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BA898FC14 for ; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:06:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p1G05uuj017652; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:05:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id p1G05uKF017649; Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:05:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:05:56 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Chris H In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20110211191232.GA2073@zod.isi.edu> <86ce5acff788efe61ceabdffe9b194fd.HRCIM@webmail.1command.com> <20110214182159.GB47006@zod.isi.edu> <07d729abeedc3b764dccc00cf73b7762.HRCIM@webmail.1command.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 15 Feb 2011 17:05:56 -0700 (MST) Cc: faber@isi.edu, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ATI Radeon LW RV200 Mobility 7500 M7 locks up on X exit X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 00:06:05 -0000 On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Chris H wrote: > On Tue, February 15, 2011 12:21 pm, Warren Block wrote: >> So many people were using AEI that I decided to write an article about >> it: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/aei.html > Fun reading, thanks for sharing. :) Thanks! > purely a question of semantics; I notice you consistently use > "On" || "Off" > Xorg(1) -configure emits "true"||"false" > Do you, or anyone else know conclusively whether it's simply a matter of: > On||Off||true||false||1||0 > or is it /only/ one, or more of the above pairs? Just curious. "On" and "Off" are more readable to me, but you can use any of those. See % man xorg.conf | less +/Boolean > In your defense to an earlier comment I made; it essentially /is/ > a "crap shoot" when it comes to setting up Xorg(1). While Xorg(1) -configure > is intended to get a "functional" version of X(7) up, and running. Hardware, > is not Hardware, is not Hardware. So a lot of "trial, and error" /will/ be > required to obtain an "optimal" X(7) environment for a specific combination > of hardware. :) Agreed, particularly for older hardware like this Dell 4300 with a GeForce 440 card in it.