Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 5 Sep 2002 06:31:25 +0400
From:      "Andrey A. Chernov" <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
To:        Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>
Cc:        i18n@FreeBSD.ORG, Maxim Sobolev <sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG>, anholt@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: koi8-r is obsoleted by koi8-u (Re: cvs commit: ports/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontCyrillic)
Message-ID:  <20020905023124.GB37309@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20020905021640.GA37309@nagual.pp.ru>
References:  <200209031042.g83AgFON078508@freefall.freebsd.org> <200209040841.45490@aldan> <20020904140410.GA30776@nagual.pp.ru> <200209041155.15033.mi%2Bmx@aldan.algebra.com> <20020905021640.GA37309@nagual.pp.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 06:16:42 +0400, Andrey A. Chernov wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 11:57:17 -0400, Mikhail Teterin wrote:
> > 
> > Can you name one scenario, where someone would knowingly prefer a koi8-r
> > font over a koi8-u one? In other words, some real application, that
> 
> This is not subject of user preferences or user choice. If some program
> request koi8-r, it must get koi8-r back exactly, because it *may* use its
> special chars. It seems you don't undertsand compatibility issues. If
> koi8-r can be replaced, it can be replaced by Unicode only.
> 

Just recall an example understandable by non-Cyrillic related people:

ISO 8859-15 differs from ISO 8859-1 only by 8 characters and is "modern",
but nobody suggest to silently replace ISO 8859-1 fonts with 8859-15 fonts
everywhere and so on.

-- 
Andrey A. Chernov
http://ache.pp.ru/

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-i18n" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020905023124.GB37309>