Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 16:42:01 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 166724] if_re(4): watchdog timeout Message-ID: <bug-166724-7501-wUL5xPrBKj@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-166724-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-166724-7501@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D166724 --- Comment #79 from L=C3=A1szl=C3=B3 K=C3=A1rolyi <laszlo@karolyi.hu> --- So, I have tested today, and the results are great. I hit my server hard with transferring a 72GB file to an SMB mount on the l= ocal network, and then I copied that file over from the SMB mount to backblaze B2 with rclone (--transfers 32). The system did 250Mbps at its peak. Here's a munin chart about it: https://i.imgur.com/yg6R6ii.png No watchdog timeouts whatsoever, no link drops, and the system stayed snappy the entire time, while I was observing the copying. I think we can safely say now that the new Realtek driver is stable and I'd really like to have it merged into the GENERIC kernel. My only concern about the driver is these lines in the dmesg: --- This product is covered by one or more of the following patents: US6,570,884, US6,115,776, and US6,327,625. --- I hope this doesn't mean that the FreeBSD project can't use the driver in i= ts kernel tree. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-166724-7501-wUL5xPrBKj>