Date: Tue, 22 Jun 2021 02:11:56 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233310] jails: Modularize configuration system (conf.d) Message-ID: <bug-233310-29815-p20QuxwdBl@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-233310-29815@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-233310-29815@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233310 joeb1@a1poweruser.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |joeb1@a1poweruser.com --- Comment #9 from joeb1@a1poweruser.com --- The function your talking about adding is all ready there in jail. There is= no restriction in having more that a single jail.conf formatted file as in one= for each jail on the host. All that is needed is a jail start command line to target each individual jail on the host. The jail command allows you to poi= nt to any file no matter its name as long as its formatted with jail statement= s. The qjail utility uses this concept as the standard way of defining and run= ning all it's non-vnet and vnet jails. Would like to see qjail become part of the base system. Comment 3 and comment 4 are also already handled in qjail. And one thing no one has brought up before is that the jail parameters defi= ned in the rc.conf file are depreciated and were scheduled to be removed in rel= ease 11 but are still being carried along forgotten. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-233310-29815-p20QuxwdBl>