From owner-freebsd-security Thu Aug 27 17:27:22 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA05762 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 17:27:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from lariat.lariat.org (lariat.lariat.org [206.100.185.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA05630 for ; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 17:26:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: (from brett@localhost) by lariat.lariat.org (8.8.8/8.8.6) id SAA18015; Thu, 27 Aug 1998 18:25:37 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199808280025.SAA18015@lariat.lariat.org> X-Sender: brett@mail.lariat.org X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1.0.49 (Beta) Date: Thu, 27 Aug 1998 18:24:46 -0600 To: "Gregory P. Smith" , security@FreeBSD.ORG From: Brett Glass Subject: Re: SSH port In-Reply-To: <199808280021.RAA03533@ryouko.nas.nasa.gov> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Sure. See http://www.research.ibm.com/news/detail/encryption.html There's an overview and a link to the paper. --Brett At 05:21 PM 8/27/98 -0700, Gregory P. Smith wrote: > >> It may be time for a new rev of SSH anyway. IBM's recently announced >> method of shutting down known ciphertext "man in the middle" attacks >> is worth adding to the protocol. > >Care to elaborate on this one (ie: a reference to the announcement or >an explanation?). (cc' the list as others are bound to ask the same >question :) > >Thanks, >Greg > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message