From owner-freebsd-current Mon Mar 20 6:28:11 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from boco.fee.vutbr.cz (boco.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.9.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58EF37B7FD for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 06:28:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz) Received: from kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz [147.229.8.12]) by boco.fee.vutbr.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA63550 for ; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:28:03 +0100 (CET) Received: (from cejkar@localhost) by kazi.dcse.fee.vutbr.cz (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA76445 for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:28:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2000 15:28:02 +0100 From: Cejka Rudolf To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: SUS/2 non-compliance in waitpid() function? Message-ID: <20000320152801.A76099@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have found that in Single Unix Specification 2 in waitpid() function there are allowed options not only WNOHANG and WUNTRACED as is in FreeBSD, but furthermore option WCONTINUED (Unixware and Solaris both know about this option and FreeBSD and possible Linux don't). The next problem is in macro WIFCONTINUED(), which is specified by SUS 2 too, but again in FreeBSD it is missing. Are there any chances to satisfy SUS 2 in FreeBSD in waitpid() function? -- Rudolf Cejka (cejkar@dcse.fee.vutbr.cz; http://www.fee.vutbr.cz/~cejkar) Brno University of Technology, Faculty of El. Engineering and Comp. Science Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message