From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 7 17:04:42 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0E5106566C; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 17:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A65D8FC1E; Sun, 7 Oct 2012 17:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id UAA15935; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:04:39 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1TKuHP-0008NS-1i; Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:04:39 +0300 Message-ID: <5071B625.6090906@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 20:04:37 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120913 Thunderbird/15.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Devin Teske References: <0655B56F-AD43-402B-872C-568378E650F9@fisglobal.com> In-Reply-To: <0655B56F-AD43-402B-872C-568378E650F9@fisglobal.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Devin Teske , freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: New Boot Loader Menu X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 07 Oct 2012 17:04:42 -0000 on 07/10/2012 02:48 Devin Teske said the following: > Hello, > > I've been working on a new boot loader menu system. > > This is what is in HEAD, CURRENT, and RELENG_9 at the moment: > > http://twitpic.com/b1pkll/full > in color: http://twitpic.com/b1pkz1/full > > > I'd like to propose the following replacement to the above: > > http://twitpic.com/b1pll5/full > in color: http://twitpic.com/b1plxi/full > > The boot options have been whisked away into a sub-menu (see below): > > http://twitpic.com/b1pm51/full > in color: http://twitpic.com/b1pme8/full > > > What does everybody think? Can't say for everybody :-) I think that the infrastructure is great. How you chose to use it in your demo might turn off some people though :-) I mean hiding of the traditional options into the sub-menu. Let's use sub-menus for the really useful stuff. Like detailing safe boot options (e.g. under Troubleshooting sub-menu; ACPI can got there too) or offering a GUI way to chose a boot+root filesystem (esp. for ZFS). Please don't mind the people who react to screenshots rather than to your work (and thus, perhaps, can't see the wood behind the trees). Whatever you do, verbose boot and single-user mode must stay on the first page. At least until the next round of evolution. -- Andriy Gapon