From owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org  Sun Jan 22 12:11:46 2017
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C9DCBC4E4
 for <freebsd-amd64@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53252DF
 for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:11:46 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0MCBkML026889
 for <freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:11:46 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 216127] sbin/restore doesn't honour extended attributes
 (extattr on ufs)
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:11:47 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: bin
X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.0-STABLE
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au
X-Bugzilla-Status: Closed
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: FIXED
X-Bugzilla-Priority: ---
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: cem@freebsd.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-216127-6-KEjDWGvWFg@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-216127-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-216127-6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform <freebsd-amd64.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-amd64>,
 <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-amd64/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64>,
 <mailto:freebsd-amd64-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 12:11:46 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D216127

--- Comment #14 from dewayne@heuristicsystems.com.au ---
(In reply to Kirk McKusick from comment #13)
Restore is used in the context of a full, and then incremental restores. So=
 it
makes sense to only restore the attributes of the file being restored and y=
es
the -u option should be used.  I think the most elegant approach is to draw=
 the
attention of users to the -u option with an additional sentence along the l=
ines
of:
"This flag is recommended when using extended attributes, to avoid improper=
ly
accumulating attributes upon (pre)existing files."

Changing the behaviour of restore in the default case, probably isn't
warranted.  Someone may a script that "requires" restore to complain for so=
me
reason!?

Thank-you for your consideration.

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=