From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 3 17:30:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107D7106564A for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:30:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@os2.kiev.ua) Received: from s1.sdv.com.ua (s1.sdv.com.ua [77.120.97.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFFC68FC17 for ; Thu, 3 Nov 2011 17:30:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 80-105-243-80.cust.centrio.cz ([80.243.105.80] helo=[192.168.101.100]) by s1.sdv.com.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1:CAMELLIA256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.76 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1RM0q4-0005Bz-03; Thu, 03 Nov 2011 19:12:30 +0200 Message-ID: <4EB2CB75.6070003@os2.kiev.ua> Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 18:12:21 +0100 From: Alex Samorukov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:7.0.1) Gecko/20110929 Thunderbird/7.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Razenberg References: <4EB1BCAD.7080206@zzattack.org> <20111102233807.GA67112@icarus.home.lan> <4EB1D6F9.3060008@zzattack.org> <20111103000124.GA67550@icarus.home.lan> <4EB1DD51.4080808@zzattack.org> <20111103002352.GA67904@icarus.home.lan> <4EB2538D.3090108@zzattack.org> In-Reply-To: <4EB2538D.3090108@zzattack.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Score: -1.0 Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List , Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Re: smartctl / mpt on 9.0-RC1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 17:30:13 -0000 Hello, I am smartmontools developer and FreeBSD port maintainer. If you could provide shell access to the affected system i can try to debug issue. I have no access to the mpt devices myself and it is unclear what going on from provided backtrace. On 11/03/2011 09:40 AM, Frank Razenberg wrote: > >> Was this system "upgraded" from RELENG_8 to RELENG_9, or was a fresh >> install of 9.x put on it directly? >