From owner-freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Thu Jul 7 04:04:44 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF55DB758DD for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 04:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C4A013AD for ; Thu, 7 Jul 2016 04:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ultima1252@gmail.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i12so5050559ywa.1 for ; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 21:04:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=zS1OQyP+Fho3y4s2969wxqZTa2NPIBuspy0iaKe9Ffs=; b=AZUF9GFtyGCH0W52gG9AI9ph3xK2JnRwa0ndbZ+AOEFPU7ROis0m/1a6GXy/qrNzEA 9KB09LFBTeTBqlih4HoqjtGNqLrle4Ev4pbfs3NfEwWHY2a/0bLzgg6O7evhrPeMP3dy SZ0JJqvl/9aoEVRDxuoMx31y5pnNP5s7RZ7S2jpgPtQMNNn2fP6ol16zHlrkZ7IgMCeV qmQr2EEEKz1qXif363hdVZZe4xwW2gr44yL/+P5vKifpGVyjto7vH47BM5dgG+qnsRgH HKRVCU9BRY/AU2St74T0up5JH/8jTklaplQwK41ZB4J/mx9eS8FFpe3LSm5xHNKKs0Gp FfMw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zS1OQyP+Fho3y4s2969wxqZTa2NPIBuspy0iaKe9Ffs=; b=VlQSh/Cvq0Hwsi+WQePCUIzAeKcEyJZEUtomhGTRR2kwucoStI0K0xOf83bIBJWHAx ArCmHgJxhvBDgPKP7hrPTNlrgch8C+lxJHgKTqZHnQHr7I+8QzXZ3bO6V7bmTev0hQUJ mKh3iU3OyjZ59syQ4lqBXc1nUosV4eCevHY6HDoND49GD4Hdy10/0EGLlkASMm1wmmtA V8pDDNYM+8JTeSmf6dz5lO41fFzEI89fpzh/w0EWDQPdYBmGWykf17D+IjL1bqlH7Fcy pPuQmjTxmj/HRte0iEIVIP6tnLqeFj8qWA7/46id6QELN75M1yf2CGMsFQ/b+lMeZmnJ tfew== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKDd9vO5t0FLoXkiKDqouM29ncEZBAW00JoxPv9BjPBsJ5xcokDaifFed306KpjTLJZLXUssXLodZCngA== X-Received: by 10.37.11.129 with SMTP id 123mr16568486ybl.55.1467864283535; Wed, 06 Jul 2016 21:04:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.129.5.216 with HTTP; Wed, 6 Jul 2016 21:04:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <2aeb6798-11ee-27c0-610a-d745aa322f97@gjunka.com> References: <2aeb6798-11ee-27c0-610a-d745aa322f97@gjunka.com> From: Ultima Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 00:04:43 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Effective rule sets in a jail? To: Grzegorz Junka Cc: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2016 04:04:44 -0000 Not so. The top variable, devfs_ruleset = 4 is being set as the default for all jails. The devfs_ruleset = 5 inside the brackets is changing the default value. How to check what ruleset is mounted? That is a great question. I'm not sure of an easy way to check other than verifying the /dev directory inside the jail. Ultima