From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 5 13:30:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9B55106566C for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEC48FC1A for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:30:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oA5DUEa8056767 for ; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oA5DUEwP056766; Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:30:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 13:30:14 GMT Message-Id: <201011051330.oA5DUEwP056766@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: "joeb" Cc: Subject: Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: joeb List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Nov 2010 13:30:14 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/148777; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "joeb" To: Cc: Subject: Re: ports/148777: [New Port] sysutils/qjail: Utility to deploy large number of jails quickly Date: Fri, 5 Nov 2010 09:27:33 -0400 What is the holdup about adding this simple port to the port system?