From owner-freebsd-advocacy  Fri May 22 17:10:33 1998
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA23097
          for freebsd-advocacy-outgoing; Fri, 22 May 1998 17:10:33 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG)
Received: from transbay.net (synergy.transbay.net [207.105.6.2])
          by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA23057
          for <advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 22 May 1998 17:10:16 -0700 (PDT)
          (envelope-from bh@transbay.net)
Received: from localhost (bh@localhost)
	by transbay.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA28156;
	Fri, 22 May 1998 17:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 22 May 1998 17:14:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brandon Huey <bh@transbay.net>
To: David Greenman <dg@root.com>
cc: Nicole <freelist@webweaver.net>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Gigabit FreeBSD 
In-Reply-To: <199805222354.QAA05785@implode.root.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.980522170900.28022A-100000@synergy.transbay.net>
X-Copyright: (C)1998 Brandon Huey; Forwarding prohibited
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

 
i thought ttcp is a memory-to-memory throughput benchmark?
doesn't that make it somewhat less appropriate for real-world simulations?
  
  -bh





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message