Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 22:15:50 +0100 From: Vincent Hoffman <vince@unsane.co.uk> To: Ewald Jenisch <a@jenisch.at> Cc: Tim Judd <tajudd@gmail.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Symantec Netbackup under 7.1 - Undefined symbol Message-ID: <49D67C86.80101@unsane.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090403193934.GA3711@aurora.oekb.co.at> References: <20090403122829.GA2201@aurora.oekb.co.at> <49D624D1.1040101@unsane.co.uk> <ade45ae90904031008x2cbd2ac7v87401495150a7d80@mail.gmail.com> <20090403193934.GA3711@aurora.oekb.co.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/4/09 20:39, Ewald Jenisch wrote: > On Fri, Apr 03, 2009 at 11:08:50AM -0600, Tim Judd wrote: > > >>> This would lead me to think you need the port misc/compat5x installed. >>> I havent any experience of netbackup though. >>> >> I agree with this statement, since it's clearly listed as it was compiled >> FOR FreeBSD 5.3 >> >> The compatXy packages are for what I think I remember reading of kernel >> system calls. I think there's a package/port for the userland utilities >> too.. misc/compat5x >> >> However I'm a smidge confused. The option that exists in the kernel and the >> misc/compat5x port -- do they accomplish the same thing, or is it really >> "kernel" and "userland" peices? >> > > The kernel options provide kernel level compatability, the port gives library (userland) compatability, dynamicly linked apps will need the librarys. > Hi, > > I've got both compat5x and compat5x installed on the machine in question: > > $ pkg_info -cx compat > Information for compat4x-i386-5.3_9: > Comment: > A convenience package to install the compat4x libraries > > Information for compat5x-amd64-5.4.0.8_9: > Comment: > A convenience package to install the compat5x libraries > $ > > In my kernel I've got the following compat-related options enabled (default): > options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD5 # Compatible with FreeBSD5 > options COMPAT_FREEBSD6 # Compatible with FreeBSD6 > > Please note, that the error message posted in my original email comes > from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > > -ewald > Fair point, I had a bit more of a think, I'd now guess that it looks like a 32/64 bit problem, its a 32bit binary on a 64 bit system and its /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 complaining not /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 whch is odd. do you have the lib32 compat stuff installed, does /libexec/ld-elf32.so.1 exist on your system? if not you can add it via sysinstall -> configure -> Distributions -> lib32. Vince
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49D67C86.80101>