Date: Thu, 31 Jul 1997 15:35:16 +10 From: "Peter Stubbs" <peters@gil.com.au> To: freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: HOTMAIL.COM, JUNO.COM, etc.... Message-ID: <199707310533.PAA20553@iccu6.ipswich.gil.com.au> In-Reply-To: <199707300015.UAA04770@pandora.hh.kew.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 Jul 97, Drew Derbyshire wrote: > Most of the SPAM I've seen recently has been from either large > sites (usally forged) or totally bogus names -- Earthlink, CIS, AOL, > ATT, and Hotmail seem popular for return addresses this month. I don't understand what a spammer has to gain from sending out mail without a valid return address. Isn't the return mail that gives them the business? What am I missing here? BTW: I had some spam on a recent hunting trip. It's disgusting! I burped up little spams for hours. ;} Cheers, Peter
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199707310533.PAA20553>