From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Oct 15 17:36:06 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EA4016A418 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44E3013C448 for ; Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:36:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: (qmail 15607 invoked from network); 15 Oct 2007 21:36:03 +0400 Received: from unknown (HELO Artem) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 15 Oct 2007 21:36:03 +0400 X-AntiVirus: Checked by Dr.Web [version: 4.44, engine: 4.44.0.09170, virus records: 249595, updated: 15.10.2007] Message-ID: <03f601c80f51$da2032d0$0c00a8c0@Artem> From: "Artem Kuchin" To: "William LeFebvre" , References: <008801c80e66$7be49490$0c00a8c0@Artem> <471367F2.7050303@lefebvre.org><037501c80f3d$69120730$0c00a8c0@Artem> <471398BB.30405@lefebvre.org> Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 21:35:53 +0400 Organization: IT Legion MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="koi8-r"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3198 Cc: Subject: Re: Question about 'top' values on memory usage, now threads X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2007 17:36:06 -0000 William LeFebvre wrote: > Artem Kuchin wrote: >> CPU is more than just enough in my case. There will a a lot https >> sitting there but load, i am sure, will be low. > > If the load is low then you may not need very many processes. They belong to different sites ;) so they need to be run constantly and for security reasons each site has its own http. >> Swapping is simply unacceptable, so i am counting only real physical >> ram. > > Whether there is actual swapping going on or not, processes will still > [SNIP] >> >> However, noone mentioned anything about threads. DO they give any >> memory advantage on freebsd? > > Yes, threading within httpd should provide a big advantage. The top > [SNIP] Thank you very much for the answers. You were very helpful! -- Regards, Artem