From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 00:18:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1570A106564A for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.188]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FD378FC0C for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2009 00:18:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from me@janh.de) Received: from janh.freebsd (e177255129.adsl.alicedsl.de [85.177.255.129]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (node=mrelayeu3) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MKxQS-1LJzec0oAL-000696; Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:18:42 +0100 Message-ID: <4962A362.9010304@janh.de> Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 01:18:42 +0100 From: Jan Henrik Sylvester User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090102) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/FFxVE+m1QkYwWpqv/4BSqo5FnVf90TKqXcJA e899T5cIPiM84RAgDe05oAWQRSums9wGtAkFrKw3fu1+w8AzS3 KCZYpII7ZnuRbZifsPm5Q== Cc: Xin Li Subject: OpenLDAP induced PORTREVISION bumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:18:44 -0000 I just face many large ports requiring updates, although mine depend on openldap23-client, which have not been updated. Thus, I decided to investigate changing openldap23-client to openldap24-client. According to 'libchk -v', only 10 of 29 of my ports bumped actually link to one of the openldap libraries. (For example kdesdk3 does not link to it.) Do I miss something? Why have all these ports been bumped? devel/gconf2 did not get bumped, although it automatically picks up the dependency if openldap*-client is installed, which probably affects many people. Why? Because it does not affect the default package? If I update openldap23-client to openldap24-client, is it advisable to rebuild all packages depending on it (81) or just the 29 that got bumped plus gconf2? (According to UPDATING, it probably should be all. According to 'libchk -v', 10+1 should be enough.) Thanks, Jan Henrik