From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 5 17:37:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CEE16A4CE for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:37:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (ol.freeshell.org [192.94.73.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93EBE43D54 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:37:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lukas@sdf.lonestar.org) Received: from sdf.lonestar.org (IDENT:lukas@xm.freeshell.org [192.94.73.22]) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i75Hbqbs006735; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 17:37:53 GMT Received: (from lukas@localhost) by sdf.lonestar.org (8.12.10/8.12.8/Submit) id i75HbqXo024089; Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:37:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2004 10:37:52 -0700 (PDT) From: Luke X-X-Sender: lukas@xm.freeshell.org To: "Thompson, Jimi" In-Reply-To: <4B3F673172B98D449EBCC3BE8316F524043661AA@exch4.elcsb.net> Message-ID: References: <4B3F673172B98D449EBCC3BE8316F524043661AA@exch4.elcsb.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND 9 Package Question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: LukeD@pobox.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 17:37:56 -0000 > Background - All was well until the boss upgraded the glibc on the > RedHat server which made all kinds of things unhappy. Taking the > opportunity to convert yet another server here to FreeBSD, I built a new > DNS on FreeBSD 4.9. > > > > I have noticed a couple of odd things. > > > > Typing in /usr/sbin/named -v, gets me this: > > > > named 8.3.6-REL Mon Oct 27 14:55:35 GMT 2003 > > root@freebsd-stable.sentex.ca:/usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named > > > > which totally doesn't look right since it should be bind 9 something or > other. The package was /usr/ports/dns/bind9 > > which stated in the package description that it would install BIND > version 9. Either the binary doesn't know what version it is or the > package has something funky in it that's yielding the wrong version > number after compilation. BIND 9 doesn't install to the same location as BIND 8. BIND8 usually goes to /usr/sbin/named BIND9 usually goes to /usr/local/sbin/named You might want to doublecheck the "named_program" setting in your rc.conf to make sure it's pointing at the new location too.