From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 15 23:51:00 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C91F106566B for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 23:51:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seanbru@yahoo-inc.com) Received: from mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.253.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B0D8FC14 for ; Tue, 15 May 2012 23:50:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (rideseveral.corp.yahoo.com [10.73.160.231]) by mrout1-b.corp.bf1.yahoo.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/y.out) with ESMTP id q4FNoeuM082551; Tue, 15 May 2012 16:50:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=yahoo-inc.com; s=cobra; t=1337125841; bh=GbG6jkDmvKjuVy+Tpnip1IBJxcwSKvL8u/feqOQXX3w=; h=Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date: Message-ID:Mime-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=EoZNW/NK+DQeRHVh1aHDUjFWNacCRLyaIUCliM+GhjXmKXI2bt91jlSIQiqFj04zK Vk6yMKa/9O0gblVjyx4jfVufibWLOkuppnB8Pmm85Z5JHyzth9q4NcCZXDdeaTIZSP 3piN7+71Tkv+R8nb2S9DZvfhN/f89Uew/gB1UfXQ= From: Sean Bruno To: David DeSimone In-Reply-To: <20120515231432.GH28776@verio.net> References: <1337105271.3434.8.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> <20120515231432.GH28776@verio.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 16:50:40 -0700 Message-ID: <1337125840.3434.21.camel@powernoodle-l7.corp.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Milter-Version: master.31+4-gbc07cd5+ X-CLX-ID: 125840001 Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: [stable-9] X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 23:51:00 -0000 On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 16:14 -0700, David DeSimone wrote: > suggests that there is only ONE default route, pointing to ONE > interface, igb0. Without an extra default route that is also pointing > to igb1, I can't see how the system woudl ever forward traffic out > igb1, > unless it was directed to the local /25. Agreed. I'm definitely setting two routes manually to the same default g/w ... pretty sure I don't know what I'm doing here, but here's the commands that are being executed: ifconfig igb0 XXX.XXX.XXX.48 netmask 255.255.255.128 ifconfig igb0 XXX.XXX.XXX.112 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig igb0 XXX.XXX.XXX.113 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig igb0 XXX.XXX.XXX.114 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias route add default XXX.XXX.XXX.1 ifconfig igb1 XXX.XXX.XXX.115 netmask 255.255.255.128 ifconfig igb1 XXX.XXX.XXX.116 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig igb1 XXX.XXX.XXX.117 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias ifconfig igb1 XXX.XXX.XXX.118 netmask 255.255.255.255 alias route add default XXX.XXX.XXX.1 For various userland application reasons, I need to add the alias entries. Sean