Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2013 00:31:01 +0400 From: Dmitry Marakasov <amdmi3@amdmi3.ru> To: Koop Mast <kwm@rainbow-runner.nl> Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, Eitan Adler <eadler@freebsd.org>, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, marcus@FreeBSD.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r313123 - head/graphics/liblqr-1 Message-ID: <20130306203101.GM65471@hades.panopticon> In-Reply-To: <51311AE0.6070305@rainbow-runner.nl> References: <201302281752.r1SHqHC9088369@svn.freebsd.org> <CAF6rxgndomd%2BCvbFBCKyEkFRnR35ET7LvOQCx5fth_PoPAuWDg@mail.gmail.com> <20130301201112.GJ65471@hades.panopticon> <51311AE0.6070305@rainbow-runner.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* Koop Mast (kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) wrote: > > Yes, I've had this in TODO, to discover why glib20 implies extra depends, > > and why "real" glib20 is named _glib20. > > > > Seems like this change was introduced quite some time ago > > > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk?r1=209646&r2=209647 > > > > Marcus, Gnome guys? > > > > _glib20 came into being to allow gio-fam-backends to build. That port > depends on gamin which needs glib20 to build. And I don't see any point > to monkey around with it at this time. This is because in glib 2.36 > _glib20 will go away. Thats not the version I'm currently testing for > merging into ports. It still in development upstream. Then don't forget to fix ports that already use _glib20 when updating (4 of them already not counting gamin/gio-fam-backends). However, I don't see why we shouldn't separate glib20 and giofam depends, since the latter is not really needed for some ports. -- Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D amdmi3@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amdmi3@jabber.ru http://www.amdmi3.ru
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130306203101.GM65471>