Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 10:48:03 -0700 From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> To: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?.. Message-ID: <509012D3.5060705@mu.org> In-Reply-To: <615577FED019BCA31EC4211B@Octca64MkIV.tdx.co.uk> References: <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> <20121030182727.48f5e649@X220.ovitrap.com> <E46B717DCFC9273E8BEC5100@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> <20121030194307.57e5c5a3@X220.ovitrap.com> <615577FED019BCA31EC4211B@Octca64MkIV.tdx.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Some suggestions here, jemalloc, kernel threads are good ones. Another issue may just be some change for default thread stack size. This would explain why the RESIDENT set is the same, but the VIRTUAL grew. -Alfred On 10/30/12 9:56 AM, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > > --On 30 October 2012 19:43 +0700 Erich Dollansky > <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> wrote: > >>> Depends how you mean 'the same' - on the 6.4 system it shows: >>> >>> cc (GCC) 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 >>> >>> And, on the 9.0-S it shows: >>> >>> cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] >>> >>> So 'same' - but different versions. >>> >> did you check the default data sizes? > > How do you mean? > >>> Now they've been running for an hour or so - they've gotten a little >>> larger 552M/154M and 703M/75M. >>> >>> If it's not harmful I can live with it - it was just a bit of a >>> surprise. >> >> And a reason to spend more money on memory. Knowing the real reason >> would be better. >> >> I can understand your surprise. > > Hehe, more 'concern' than surprise I guess now... > > The sendmail milter has grown to a SIZE/RES of 1045M / 454M under 9.0. > The original 6.4 machine under heaver load (more connections) shows a > SIZE/RES of 85M/52M. > > The TCP listener code is now showing a SIZE/REZ of 815M/80M under 9.0 > with the original 6.4 box showing 44M/9.5M > > The 9.0 box says it has 185M active, 472M inactive, 693M wired, 543M > buf, and 4554M free. > > At this stage I'm just a bit concerned that at least the milter code > is going to grow, and grow - and die. > > I would think it would last over night so I'll see what the figures > are in the morning. > > Thanks for the replies... > > -Karl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-hackers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?509012D3.5060705>