From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 21 14:29:08 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62A8E16A41F for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:29:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7CD43D45 for ; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:29:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 24822 invoked from network); 21 Jul 2005 14:29:06 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail21.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 21 Jul 2005 14:29:06 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id B640D38; Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:29:05 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20050718163250.D28772@maren.thelosingend.net> <44d5peixay.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050720004530.B48721@maren.thelosingend.net> <44ackhk43d.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050721001829.D61532@maren.thelosingend.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 21 Jul 2005 10:29:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20050721001829.D61532@maren.thelosingend.net> Message-ID: <44oe8wi66m.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some sort of filter based filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 14:29:08 -0000 Svein Halvor Halvorsen writes: > * Lowell Gilbert [2005-07-20 09:19 -0400] > > You're right that the outputs wouldn't *have* to be pre-generated, but > > doing it on the fly would make the project both more difficult to > > implement and (I think) less convenient to use. > > This, I do not get. Why is it, that this would be less convenient? In > fact, I see no other use for this than to save disk space when you want > data available in several (information perserved) formats? I see it as being something you will usually want when you're copying the music off somewhere else. In that case, the speed hit would be annoying. I don't expect people to play the same songs in different formats on the same machine...