From owner-cvs-usrbin Mon Oct 27 17:12:38 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA12259 for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 17:12:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-cvs-usrbin) Received: from ns1.yes.no (ns1.yes.no [195.119.24.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA12241; Mon, 27 Oct 1997 17:12:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eivind@bitbox.follo.net) Received: from bitbox.follo.net (bitbox.follo.net [194.198.43.36]) by ns1.yes.no (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id BAA04128; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 01:12:09 GMT Received: (from eivind@localhost) by bitbox.follo.net (8.8.6/8.8.6) id CAA00610; Tue, 28 Oct 1997 02:12:09 +0100 (MET) Date: Tue, 28 Oct 1997 02:12:09 +0100 (MET) Message-Id: <199710280112.CAA00610@bitbox.follo.net> From: Eivind Eklund To: Guido van Rooij CC: ache@nagual.pp.ru, guido@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Guido van Rooij's message of Mon, 27 Oct 1997 23:35:19 +0100 (MET) Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/su su.1 su.c References: <199710272235.XAA23016@gvr.gvr.org> Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > [______ ______] wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Oct 1997, Guido van Rooij wrote: > > > > > guido 1997/10/27 14:05:14 PST > > > > > > Modified files: > > > usr.bin/su su.1 su.c > > > Log: > > > Add -c option that allows root to specify a login_class. > > > > Why not -L as for "pw"? I think we need somehow standartize login class > > option between applications. F.e. "limits" uses -C (already occuped > > in "pw") :-( > > > > In fact I started with -C, and reverted to -c because that is what > BSD/OS uses for the same option. I know -c is used in some other > Unixen to specify a command. If more ppl feel this is more painfull > than being incompatible with BSD/OS's su, please yeel and I'll > chaneg it to -C (or -L or whatever). -c is used in *FreeBSD* to specify a command, or at least was used prior to your commit. IMO, being internally consistent and not re-using options is more important than being compatible with BSD/OS here - my vote is for using -C. Eivind.