Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 21 Jun 2004 13:15:37 -0400
From:      "Kurt J. Lidl" <lidl@pix.net>
To:        Cyrille Lefevre <clefevre-lists@9online.fr>
Cc:        Clifton Royston <cliftonr@lava.net>
Subject:   Re: Sticky/sgid/suid bits safe on regular files?
Message-ID:  <20040621131537.D9593@pix.net>
In-Reply-To: <070301c454c4$8f17ee90$7890a8c0@dyndns.org>; from clefevre-lists@9online.fr on Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:41:05AM %2B0200
References:  <20040617205549.GA19254@lava.net> <070301c454c4$8f17ee90$7890a8c0@dyndns.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 01:41:05AM +0200, Cyrille Lefevre wrote:
> "Clifton Royston" <cliftonr@lava.net> wrote:
> [snip]
> >   Can anybody confirm for me that the suid, sgid, and sticky bit are in
> > fact no-ops for FreeBSD on regular non-executable files, as it appears
> > they should be?
> 
> how about the use of hard link which is not os depedent ?

Then you have twice as many directory entries for the system to manage,
which might be a resource hog if you have many files.

-Kurt



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040621131537.D9593>