From owner-freebsd-questions Sun Jun 20 15:51:40 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from spool.webzone.net (mail.webzone.net [205.219.23.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C03D14FF5 for ; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 15:51:37 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from murban@webzone.net) Received: from webzone.net ([208.165.100.34]) by spool.webzone.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0813 ID# 0-12689) with ESMTP id AAA26235; Sun, 20 Jun 1999 17:55:34 -0500 Message-ID: <376D714F.DC1AAE3E@webzone.net> Date: Sun, 20 Jun 1999 17:55:11 -0500 From: Michael Urban Reply-To: murban@webzone.net X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.6-RELEASE i386) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Tani Hosokawa Cc: Ludwig Pummer , questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Nt outperforms Linux for web/file server? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Tani Hosokawa wrote: > You're also missing the fact that NT did kick Apache/Linux' ass in the > test, and would have done so regardless what kernel patches/Apache tweaks > were applied. Fact is, Apache's not a high performance web server .. Um... What?? Apache consistantly recieves very high marks on the fact that it is very fast, and very high performance. If Apache was not a high performance web server, then over half the web sites in the world would not be running it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message