From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Apr 21 02:47:55 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8AFA16A4CE
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (mail.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.17.13])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1992643D1F
	for <net@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 21 Apr 2004 02:47:55 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from novo@cs.tu-berlin.de)
Received: from 130-149-145-64.dialup.cs.tu-berlin.de
	(130-149-145-64.dialup.cs.tu-berlin.de [130.149.145.64])
	by mail.cs.tu-berlin.de (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA18751;
	Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:45:01 +0200 (MET DST)
Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 11:45:36 +0200 (CEST)
From: Harti Brandt <novo@cs.tu-berlin.de>
X-X-Sender: novo@130-149-145-64.dialup.cs.tu-berlin.de
To: Petri Helenius <pete@he.iki.fi>
In-Reply-To: <408613F7.1090806@he.iki.fi>
Message-ID: <20040421114416.F640@130-149-145-64.dialup.cs.tu-berlin.de>
References: <20040419110912.A71274@xorpc.icir.org>
	<408613F7.1090806@he.iki.fi>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org>
cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: what is the story on if_index allocation ?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: harti@FreeBSD.ORG
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
	<mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Apr 2004 09:47:56 -0000



On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Petri Helenius wrote:

> Luigi Rizzo wrote:
>
> >Can someone explain what is the goal ? Reuse a number if an
> >interface has the same name of a previously existing one and
> >the index is free ? And does it make sense, anyways, or
> >we could just simplify that code and just reuse the first
> >available entry in ifindex_table[] ?
> >
> >
> The optimal course of action (from management software point of view) is
> to retain as static ifName to ifIndex mapping. If the index changes for
> the same interface, you're supposed to have lower sysUpTime than on
> previous query.

That mapping certainly has problems with interface renaming. Currently
there is no way of getting at the driver's name of the interface.

harti