From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 20 18:49:26 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8AA106566C for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [199.26.172.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505508FC08 for ; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id m8KInONM012280 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:49:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id m8KInOQP012279; Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:49:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA10731; Sat, 20 Sep 08 11:38:04 PDT Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 11:39:38 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: list@mindling.com Message-Id: <48d5436a.PnupVNQWy4YgXwX/%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <200809191758.m8JHwmak010862@lurza.secnetix.de> <48D5226E.7010407@mindling.com> In-Reply-To: <48D5226E.7010407@mindling.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtek 8111C? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Sep 2008 18:49:26 -0000 > ... I thought I'd try copying the driver from 7.1. The module > (if_re.ko) appears to load successfully at boot time, however > the NIC is still not shown in dmesg and unavailable as re0. > I admit I don't know if this should even work (7.1-compiled > module on 6.3 kernel) ... That would indeed not be expected to work. Even a 7.1 module on a 7.0 system would be hit-or-miss; across a major revision it's a wonder it didn't panic. You could try building the module from the 7.1 source on 6.3.